OpenAtlas bITEM to ARCHE meeting 2025-10-17, 11:00

Location: Online
Updated information in the course of the meeting is in color and/or marked with an ✅. Every participant is welcome to add and adapt.

Topics are about archiving the bItem project, that used OpenAtlas respectively THANADOS for data acquisition and structuring, in the long term archiving system ARCHE

Participants

ARCHE OpenAtlas bITEM

Topics

See also: meeting protocol https://redmine.openatlas.eu/projects/uni/wiki/Meeting_2025-06-03

ARCHE needs some more information from bITEM; while having a look at the data and metadata, some problems were found that can't be solved technically by ARCHE:

Images

Multiple creators and license holders need to be separated
Who contributed to the project and should be stated as MetadataCreator
File clean up: License issues

Descriptions on bITEM

Duplicates and formats

Some file check issues

More bITEM Metadata

More metadata for the top collection Deposition Agreement

ARCHE needs more background information on bITEM itself for the top collection - see IUENNA on ARCHE as a sample; description of project is needed, other information can be retracted from Datenübergabevertrag; a table with needed information will be provided by Martina to Viola, Roland and Stefan, Viola will provide a description for the bITEM project; furthermore the bITEM team (+ Bernhard) will keep working on the deposition agreement and will contact the ARCHE team if help is needed

Someone should serve as contact person who can be contacted by the ARCHE team if more problems arise during the archiving process - Stefan (CC an Nina) will serve as direct contact to ARCHE for any non-OpenAtlas questions; Viola and Roland will sign the deposition agreement

Further Information

Is it ok to incorporate the data into PFP?

PFP as prosopographic research platform at the ACDH ("Wikidata for names") - can bITEM data also be incorporated in there? bITEM: Yes of course it can be; Kulturpool and ARIADNE use ARCHE as source as well, but neither ARIADNE nor Kulturpool makes sense in the case of bITEM; ARIADNE gets the information vial THANADOS anyways; for Kulturpool data isn't suited; 3D models are integrated into Kulturpool anyway -> so it would be twice the work for the same outcome; if the bITEM team changes their mind about that, they'll reach out again

Archive Statistics