Project

General

Profile

Actions

Site designs

Here we collect ideas for the generic presentation sites.
Sorry about the not so fine looking draft, it's just a starting point and feel free to add/adapt/restructure.

Views

This are individual views, in parenthesis criteria are criteria defined how to fetch related entities. Possible are:
  • system_class (OpenAtlas specific class definitions used in the backend and also useful for frontend)
  • view_class (Collection of system_class, e.g. actor for person and group)
  • cidoc_class (not sure if needed)
    You can see how these are related in the backend at model/OpenAtlas classes, e.g. in the demo at this site

General Notes

  • Empty fields/attributes should be hidden.
  • It should be possible to choose the default entity view via the CMS, similar to how it should be possible to what the default landing page is.

Main views

  • All
    • Should have a breadcrumb for their system classes. Clicking on elements higher in the hierarchy should lead to the data view containing elements of that system class.
      Note about the breadcrumb (by Alex): in the backend the breadcrumb begins with the view, not the system class. E.g. with a system class of activity, acquisition, move, ... the first element would be the view for "event".
      This is just a note and it can of course differ at the frontend. See about classes and views
  • Primary
    • Name
    • Alias (only for place and actor)
    • Types
    • Dates
    • Description
    • Profile image
  • Secondary
    • References (This is probably dependent on the entity).
    • All other Attributes
    • @Mocca, I believe it should not include the attributes shown already, e.g. if the images are shown in the gallery, the link to the file entity would not be needed.
  • Source (system_class source)
    • Description extra important. It could be a summary or the source itself.
    • Multiple Tabs for the different texts (Translations, Transliterations, ...)
    • Download buttons for the non-viewable files extra important here.
  • Event (view_class event), this includes: Acquisition, Activity, Creation, Event, Modification, Move, Production.
    • The diferences are detailed in the Manual. Most share most commonalities with Activity, therefor a common template would be sensible.
    • All except Event:
      • Sub-Event
      • Pre/Super-ceding event.
      • Location (on map)
      • Actors:
        • Timespan of Actor for the event.
        • Standard type: Involvement
  • Actor (view_class actor), this includes: Person, Group. Detailed in Manual
    • All
      • Residence
      • Born/Started in
      • Died/Ended in
  • Place (system_class place)
    • All
      • Location (on map)
      • Administrative unit & historic place:
        • Show as title & description & date (the Most important info)
      • Show sub-locations (on map)
      • Show all connected artifacts & human remains.
    • Feature (system_class feature)
      • For features and all "lower" elements (like Stratographic units, ..) it should be possible to navigate to the neighbouring entities (in the list not necessarily location wise).
      • Linked Stratographic units
      • Here breadcrumbs are especially important again.
    • Stratigraphic unit (system_class stratigraphic_unit)
  • Artifact (view_class artifact), this includes artifacts and human remains (maybe split them?)
    • Images are essential, it might make sense to differ the view for images a bit for artifacts to accommodate for that.
    • Owned by -> Actor
    • Sub-Artifacts
  • Vocabulary (not sure how to name or structure these)
    • Type (system_class type)
      • External & Interal reference are crucial.
      • Type hierarchy, potentially a place for breadcrumbs again.
      • Linked entities, both directly and for subtypes:
        • Count
        • List
      • Bar Graph
    • Administrative unit (system_class administrative_unit), there are 2 fixed hierarchies (administrative units and historical places)
  • File
There is some information that can possible be included in most (or at least multiple) classes so maybe we want to design a kind of "base layout". These are:
  • Name
  • Alias (only for place and actor)
  • Types
  • Dates
  • Description
  • Profile image (either a set one or just the first one, this could be a good point for a gallery function. The file class obviously is a special case)
  • Reference to a source entity
  • External references (e.g. to Wikidata, GeoNames or Vocabs)
  • References (e.g. edition)
  • Map (if connected to a place, e.g. in a move event or a residence of a person)
    • I(@mocca) believe it would be a good idea to show linked places in this map as well, at least on demand. E.g. a gravesite would also show the connected graves on the same map.
  • Files (attached to that entity)
Likely an extra view isn't needed for these
Following system classes probably won't need an own view:
  • actor_function (actor function at a group e.g. a profession)
  • actor_relation (between actors)
  • appellation (alias)
  • involvement (actor function at an event)
  • bibliography
  • edition
  • external_reference
  • object_location
  • reference_system
  • type_tools (types for e.g. radio carbon values, ... we take of these later)

Maps

  • When an overview, e.g. at start page, only show system_class place and only use markers (if area choose center point)
  • When showing at a detail view (e.g. of a place) show areas (instead of center points) and next subunits (e.g. features of a place)

Updated by Moritz Großfurtner 9 months ago · 14 revisions

Also available in: PDF HTML TXT