Actions
Question #1143
closed
Naming the type field
Start date:
2020-02-12
Estimated time:
Description
Since in LPF (Linked Places Format) the type for a place is FeatureCollection I named the other types also with Collection. (i.e. 'E53': 'PlaceCollection', 'E21': 'ActorCollection', 'E74': 'ActorCollection','E40': 'ActorCollection', 'E7': 'EventCollection', 'E8': 'EventCollection', 'E9': 'EventCollection', 'E33': 'SourceCollection', 'E31': 'DocumentCollection', 'E84': 'ObjectCollection', 'E18': 'FeatureCollection')
Is this reasonable? The problem is, that it would be a collection, if we would add more entities to 'feature', but LPF also include only one entity in a FeatureCollection.
Updated by Bernhard Koschiček-Krombholz almost 5 years ago
- Priority changed from 3 to 5
Updated by Bernhard Koschiček-Krombholz almost 5 years ago
What about:
- "Finds"
- "Human Remains"
- "Types"
Updated by Alexander Watzinger almost 5 years ago
- Status changed from New to Acknowledged
Updated by Bernhard Koschiček-Krombholz over 4 years ago
- Status changed from Acknowledged to Closed
Everything is a FeatureCollection
Actions