Feature #2597
Updated by Alexander Watzinger 3 months ago
Like discussed we will import existing data from Pious Travels to the MoByz project.
*Update*
This is the mapping of existing data to OpenAtlas/CIDOC CRM:
* *id* -> seems to be a sequential id and question if needed because we have id_string as unique identifier
* *site* -> Historical Place (Place E53)
* *placement* -> Place (Physical thing E18)
** Connection to site: E18 -> P53 -> E53 -> P89 -> E53
*Sources*
* *id_string* -> title of a *Source* (E33 Linguistic object)
* *commentary* -> content of a *Source* (E33 Linguistic object)
* *source* -> added to content of a *Source* (E33 Linguistic object)
* *transcription* -> *Source translation* (E33 Linguistic Object)
** link to *Source*: E33 -> P73 -> E33 with *Type* (P2 -> E55) Original text
* *transcription_corrected* -> *Source translation* (E33 Linguistic Object)
** link to *Source*: E33 -> P73 -> E33 with *Type* (P2 -> E55) Original text corrected
* *translation* -> *Source translation* (E33 Linguistic Object)
** link to *Source*: E33 -> P73 -> E33 with *Type* (P2 -> E55) Translation
* *transcription_simplified* -> *Source translation* (E33 Linguistic Object)
** link to *Source*: E33 -> P73 -> E33 with *Type* (P2 -> E55) Translation
* *language* -> we could use a type but there is only one entry defined (Russian), others could be defaulted to Greek
*Artifact*
* *id_string* -> title for an *Artifact* (E22)
* *date* -> assuming this the creation date of the text and because it's not a "real" date written as description of the artifact
* *site2* -> assuming this to be additional information of the inscription added also to the artifact description
* *description* -> assuming this to be additional information of the inscription added also to the artifact description
* *images* -> if these are provided with the correct names, we could import them as *File* (E31 Document)
** link to Artifact via E31 -> P67 -> E22
* *current_location* -> to be discussed (type, current owner, ...)
*Questions*
* OK to drop id field?
* Clarify *date*, *site2*
* *author* needed? For reproducibility we could add the two authors as users and link their entities.
* *created* needed? Seems to be the date of the data entry.