Feature #574
Updated by Stefan Eichert over 8 years ago
Whitepaper Geometries Content Concept 1. What types of physical things with locations are there according to the sources 1a. How precise or fuzzy is their extend defined 1b. Which various possibilites can be observed regarding the identification of an physical object with a spatial position Technical requirements 2. What types of geometries are needed to map the spatial extend/position of the objects Technical Details 3. Tables used to represent the objects and their location 4. Queries and Triggers used to update/delete/insert additional/needed information. UI and Userinput 5. Buttons and forms 5.1. Add Geometry h1. 1. What types of physical things with locations are there according to the sources I. Physical things like buildings, settlements, regions, areas etc. that have or originally had a position in space and a certain extend II. Roads/routes/rivers that have or originally had a position in space and a certain extend III. (Find-)Spots with Points where for example an archaeological find has been found. h2. 1a. How precise or fuzzy is their extend defined Ad. I. and II.: Either the polygon represents the extend=shape of the physical thing or the original (and no spatial longer known) extend that is located within a polygon Ad. III. There is no extend but only have point coordinates. a known centerpoint. h2. 1b. Which various possibilites can be observed regarding the identification of a physical object with a spatial position case 1: The extend is known and can be drawn as a polygon that represents the extend=shape of the physical thing E.g. the shape of a building or the area of excavation or the area of a settlement that can be drawn for example from an aerial photograph or a map. case 2a: 2: The extend is not known but known to be within a larger area with known extend that can be drawn as a polygon. polygon E.g a no longer existing settlement that is known to have been situated within a known area for example in a valley between two other known settlements. case 2b: The extend is not known but known to be within a larger predefined area with known extend that is already in the database. E.g an archeological findspot of unknown position that is known to have been situated inside the boundaries of a certain administrative unit. case 3: The extend is not known but known to be within a larger area with unknown extend that cannot be drawn as a polygon E.g. a no longer existing settlement that is known to have been situated within the historical boundaries of a no longer existing county. case 4: There is no extend but only a known centerpoint E.g. the coordinates where one find has been found. case 5: Neither the extend nor a vague position within a reasonable larger area are known. In many cases the exact identification of physical things/places mentioned in sources (e.g. in charters or also in archaeological publications) with one certain and still existing physcial entity and its extend is not possible. Therefore it is necessary to allow multiple possibilites to record possible locations of physical things: A charter for example may mention one church and today two still existing churches might be identified with the one mentioned. In this case the church-entity from the source should be linked to two possible spatial objects. Here they would be two polygons, representing the extend of the respective church. However, any combination of the above mentioned cases (from 1 to 3) must be technically and conceptually possible in any number. In theory it must be possible to link e.g. a castle known from a charter to the very extend of a still existing castle and at the same time to a vanished castle that is known to have been located within a certain area and also to another possible location within a certain administrative unit etc. etc. h1. 2. User Input Each entity with spatial position will be represented on the map at least with a marker as point. If polygon data is available these polygons will be shown too. We want to offer the possibility to define the spatial position in any combination of the aforementioned categories. Therefore the location of the physical entity is connected 1-n to one or more entries in the gis-tables In the map interface: 1.) The user should be able to draw polygons to define either the extend of the physical entity or an area in which the physical thing is situated. Also predefined categories should be chosen to define whether it is extend or area. These polygons should be editable and deletable. Methods: leaflet draw polygon and postgis Form with: Dropdown for Category selection (shape or area with certain probability) Text field for description 2.) The user should be able to set markers to define a point of location. In this case a point is drawn and saved to gis_centerpoints. No polygon is drawn. Triggers: Create/update centerpoint data automatically after polygon is drawn or edited using postgis ST_PointOnSurface Warnings if Point data is updated and moved outside of polygon using postgis ST_Contains h1. 2. What types of geometries are needed to map the spatial extend/position of the objects Polygons and Points h1. 3. Tables used to represent the objects and their location gis.centerpoint gis.polygon h1. 4. Queries and Triggers used to update/delete/insert additional/needed information. h1. 6. Buttons and forms h2. 6.1. Add Geometry