Feature #1004
open
- Description updated (diff)
One solution would be to implement a parallel date system (e.g. using only years) but this would be way to cumbersome and error prone, we really like using the database for date operations.
So I ask in the PostgreSQL mailing list about it: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca438ff8331c4e109aa1b75a130948ac%40oeaw.ac.at
After it passed the moderation I got responses immediately. None of them saying they would implement it but still great it got taken seriously and got some feedback. Maybe Stefan or somebody else want to join this discussion?
Is there any news about this issue? We have finds and sites to track within bITEM that are from 50.000 BC and it is not possible.
- Status changed from Acknowledged to Assigned
- Assignee set to Stefan Eichert
I haven't heard anything new. Maybe Stefan, whom I just assigned it to, would like to post in the mailing list again.
Just to keep things going and to show our continued interest in this topic.
- Assignee changed from Stefan Eichert to Bernhard Koschiček-Krombholz
Assigning to Bernhard to post a reminder/question in the PostgreSQl mailing list.
- Assignee changed from Bernhard Koschiček-Krombholz to Nina Richards
Thank you, Nina, for writing a new Mail. I assign this issue to you for further documentation. I hope they will answer soon.
- Assignee changed from Nina Richards to Bernhard Koschiček-Krombholz
Also available in: Atom
PDF